314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654440)
1. Institutional review board approval required by rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):3. PubMed ID: 11654440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices.
Holder AR
IRB; 1980; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research.
Levine RJ
Perspect Biol Med; 1980 Pt 2): S99-S114, Winter; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.
McGough H
IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal agency's final rule says informed consent forms must be dated.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11655034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Food and Drug Administration's role in the protection of human subjects.
Nightingale SL
IRB; 1983; 5(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11649511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review board becomes enmeshed in lawsuit.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Nov; 9(11):4. PubMed ID: 11654163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The noninstitutional review board: a case history.
Herman SS
IRB; 1984; 6(1):1-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11649540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent.
Kelsey FO
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
