These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654443)

  • 41. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors.
    Grumet BR
    Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Dooling RP
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
    Clementino BJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
    Baron CH
    Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act.
    Flannery EJ
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors.
    Costello JC
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Treatment and minors: issues not involving lifesaving treatment.
    King PA
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):241-65. PubMed ID: 11658744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Compulsory medical treatment of adults.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In re Quinlan: one court's answer to the problem of death with dignity.
    Falck DP
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1977; 34(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 11663016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of minors in health care decision making: current legal issues.
    Waxse DJ
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 11654286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
    Hamann AA
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
    Moore ML
    North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Competence to refuse medical treatment: autonomy vs. paternalism.
    Annas GJ; Densberger JE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):561-96. PubMed ID: 11649779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
    Francis LP
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.