314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654473)
21. Population policy making: reproductive freedom and the "compelling" state interest.
Yates KA
UMKC Law Rev; 1973; 42(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 11661099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Genetic choices: a paradigm for prospective international ethics?
Knoppers BM; Le Bris S
Politics Life Sci; 1994 Aug; 13(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 11654636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Normative judgment, social change, and legal reasoning in the context of abortion and privacy.
Schnably SJ
Rev Law Soc Change; 1984-1985; 13(4):715-910. PubMed ID: 11659092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Family planning through human cloning: is there a fundamental right?
Wu L
Columbia Law Rev; 1998 Oct; 98(6):1461-515. PubMed ID: 11658070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic therapy: ethical and religious reflections.
Gustafson JM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():183-200. PubMed ID: 11645738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Surrogacy on three continents.
Franklin S
Bull Med Ethics; 1991; No. 65():13-8. PubMed ID: 11651058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Asexual reproduction and genetic engineering: a constitutional assessment of the technology of cloning.
Pizzulli F
South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):476-584. PubMed ID: 11660870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options.
Hovius B
Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Procreational autonomy v. state intervention: opportunity or crisis for a brave new world?
Smith GP
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):635-60. PubMed ID: 11650886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. From cannibalism to caesareans: two conceptions of fundamental rights.
Hasnas J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1995; 89(3):900-41. PubMed ID: 11660128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion and the neutral state.
Hunt RP
First Things; 1990 Oct; 6():42-5. PubMed ID: 11659507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
Copelon R
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In whose image? Religion and the controversy of human cloning.
Campbell CS
Second Opin; 1999 Sep; No. 1():24-43. PubMed ID: 11657759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
Massie AM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion rights: taking responsibilities more seriously than Dworkin.
Trakman LE; Gatien S
SMU Law Rev; 1995; 48(3):585-608. PubMed ID: 11660800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
Robertson JA
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
