These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654474)

  • 1. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.
    Healy P
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses.
    Young AH
    Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options.
    Hovius B
    Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethics of babymaking.
    Sherwin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
    Tolton C
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship, particularity, and change: reflections on R. v. Morgentaler and feminist approaches to liberty.
    Lessard H
    McGill Law J; 1991 Apr; 36(2):263-307. PubMed ID: 11659529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.
    Shanner L
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behaviour alteration, the Law Reform Commission and the courts: an ethical perspective.
    Kluge EH
    Dalhous Law J; 1988 Oct; 11(3):864-84. PubMed ID: 11659286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A role for law in matters of morality.
    McTeer MA
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 11654473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design.
    Weinrib LE
    Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to procreate: when rights claims have gone wrong.
    Shanner L
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):823-74. PubMed ID: 11654471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criminal liability for fetal endangerment: editor's introduction.
    Kleinig J
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11650906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
    American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.