These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654475)

  • 1. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
    Goldberg S
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
    Grant I
    Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand.
    Tateishi SA
    Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
    Gallagher J
    Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dorczak A
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.
    Healy P
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
    Goldberg S
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
    Dobson T; Eby KK
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.