380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654494)
1. Liberty and assisted reproduction.
Robertson JA
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology and the family.
Robertson JA
Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Report on Australian national conference: "Surrogacy -- In Whose Interest?", Melbourne, February 1991.
Salomone J
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11651336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation.
Robertson JA
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel.
Shapira A
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
Wurmbrand MJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies.
Thom M
Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization.
Dickman DG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization.
Andrews LB
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
