484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654512)
1. Ethics in evolution.
Huston P
CMAJ; 1996 Aug; 155(4):363. PubMed ID: 11654512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics of human research.
Squires BP
CMAJ; 1994 Oct; 151(8):1103. PubMed ID: 11652707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans.
Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N
J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Sciences Council of Japan adopts guidelines for gene therapy clinical research.
Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):560-3. PubMed ID: 11657358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare.
Bergkamp L
IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Overseeing regulations or intimidating researchers?
Wax ML; Capron AM
IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 11661947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense.
Winter PE
IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern.
Gordon B; Prentice E
IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The history of institutional review boards.
Sherman M; Van Vleet JD
Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
