These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654526)
1. Personal experiences of research misconduct and the response of individual academic scientists. Braxton JM; Bayer AE Sci Technol Human Values; 1996; 21(2):198-213. PubMed ID: 11654526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world. Guston DH Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct. Francis S Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research. Cowen RC Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct. Knoll E J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation. Sprague RL Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data. Greenberg M; Goldberg L Sci Technol Human Values; 1994; 19(2):223-41. PubMed ID: 11652278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography. Anderson J J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing. Koshland DE Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson). Swazey JP Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On being a whistleblower: the Needleman case. Ernhart CB; Scarr S; Geneson DF Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11653083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]