BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654532)

  • 1. US genome chief withdraws five papers over fraud.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1303. PubMed ID: 11654532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Falsified data found in gene studies: fraud leads scientist to withdraw research papers on leukemia.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Oct; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Ambition and impatience' blamed for fraud.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):6-7. PubMed ID: 8900256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How charges of lab fraud grew into a cause célèbre.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():C1, C5. PubMed ID: 11646839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collins' student sanctioned over 'most severe' case of fraud.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):313. PubMed ID: 9237737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New charges hit Illmensee.
    MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fraud and the norms of science.
    Schmaus W
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1983; 8(4):12-22. PubMed ID: 11651715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Too good to be true.
    Colt GH
    Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assault on David Baltimore.
    Kevles DJ
    New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH to review Emory in Darsee case.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4601):1029. PubMed ID: 11643994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Science friction.
    Gladwell M
    Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two critics of science revel in the role.
    Boffey PM
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Apr; ():C1. PubMed ID: 11646670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.