These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The spermatic market: surrogate stock and liquid assets. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 11650382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The mode of reproduction in transition: a Marxist-feminist analysis of the effects of reproductive technologies. Gimenez ME Gend Soc; 1991 Sep; 5(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 11659503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: policy concerns for women. Woliver LR Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11650309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogacy: for love but not for money? Anleu SR Gend Soc; 1992 Mar; 6(1):30-48. PubMed ID: 11659538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case. Allen AL Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: a feminist perspective. Rothman BK Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1599-607. PubMed ID: 11653382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies. Thom M Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy. Ewing C; Rowland R Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 11650919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Surrogate mothering" and women's freedom: a critique of contracts for human reproduction. Shanley ML Signs (Chic); 1993; 18(3):618-39. PubMed ID: 11659996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A question of choice? IVF and the politics of coercion. Scutt JA Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 11651477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The deflective power of reproductive technologies: the impact on women. Woliver LR Women Polit; 1989; 9(3):17-47. PubMed ID: 11659737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where speech has lost its power: a social ethical reflection on the meaning of surrogate motherhood. Hewitt MA Tor J Theol; 1990; 6(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 11651339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Debunking the rhetoric of surrogacy arrangements. Appleby B Tor J Theol; 1990; 6(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 11651338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rights, relationships, class, and gender: issues in the politics of surrogate contracts. Richard PB Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 11650313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Society's response to the new reproductive technologies: the feminist perspectives. Wikler NJ South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1043-57. PubMed ID: 11655849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Making motherhood male: surrogacy and the moral economy of women. Morgan D J Law Soc; 1985 Summer;; 12(2):219-38. PubMed ID: 11649205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]