425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654704)
1. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
Hoffmann DE
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
Suhr JN
Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study.
Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court to rule on right to die in case of brain injury victim.
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
