439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654704)
21. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of families in medical decisions.
Minow M
Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Another right-to-die case poses new questions.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Doing justice to life: for the Cruzans, pain; for principle, a triumph; How to put life in the right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Grant ER; Cleaver CA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Ronzetti TA
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Does right to privacy include right to die? Court to decide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
