These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65. The judicial aspects of artificial insemination. Strasberg-Cohen T Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 11649658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Of ice and men: the big chill over women's reproductive rights. Raymond JG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11649281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Reproductive responsibilities: rethinking the fetal rights debate. Burtt S Policy Sci; 1994; 27(2-3):179-96. PubMed ID: 11656483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion. Townsend MD Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology? Bercovitch J Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Wombs for rent, selves for sale? Smith DH J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():23-36. PubMed ID: 11645611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. A question of meaning? Controversies about the new reproductive technologies in the Netherlands. Kirejczyk M Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11649279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Procreational autonomy v. state intervention: opportunity or crisis for a brave new world? Smith GP Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):635-60. PubMed ID: 11650886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Of father born: a lesbian feminist critique of the Ontario Law Reform Commission recommendations on artificial insemination. Coffey MA Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):424-33. PubMed ID: 11651097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The regulation of assisted conception in England. Stern K Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11654549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. New York, in move to bar AIDS, puts new limits on sperm banks. Verhovek SH N Y Times Web; 1989 Oct; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11647874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Gamete donation and anonymity. Haimes E Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():25-7. PubMed ID: 11651085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction. Robertson JA South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]