268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654750)
1. Practical ethical issues related to the care of elderly people with dementia.
Watson R
Nurs Ethics; 1994 Sep; 1(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 11654750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues and terminal management of the old old.
Hesse KA
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1995; 28(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 11654994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cogito ergo sum? -- refocusing dementia ethics in a hypercognitive society.
O'Neill D
Ir J Psychol Med; 1997 Dec; 14(4):121-3. PubMed ID: 11660683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The withdrawal of medical treatment from patients: fundamental legal issues.
Robertson D
Aust Law J; 1996 Sep; 70(9):723-46. PubMed ID: 11660615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
Franklin C; Weil MH
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a constitutional right to die?
Wickett A
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die.
Brennan C
New Law J; 1993 Jul; 143(6609):1041-2. PubMed ID: 11652271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
Bopp J; Avila D
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. All's well that ends well: toward a policy of assisted rational suicide or merely enlightened self determination?
Smith GP
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):275-419. PubMed ID: 11650248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to the papers by Molloy and colleagues (Canada) and Cranford (United States) on advance directives.
Dickens BM
Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 11652946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
