These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654754)
21. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials. Weijer C IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Childress JF Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Questions and answers. Goodwin FK J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Women and health research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Mastroianni AC; Faden R; Federman D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Mar; 4(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10132589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role? Freedman B IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects. Fletcher JC Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research. Benson PR; Roth LH Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research. Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Human experimentation and human rights. Katz J St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements. Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Leibrock LG; Prabhu VC; Kelso TK; Sears TD IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11652322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations. Fisher CB IRB; 1997; 19(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 11655184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks. Puglisi JT; Ellis GB Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. US researchers fail to get informed consent. Roberts J BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6931):739. PubMed ID: 11644521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Calls for strengthened drug-trial guidelines in Japan. Netley G Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9051):552. PubMed ID: 11654595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Panel backs pregnant women in trials. Anderson C Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5151):1216. PubMed ID: 8122099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]