604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654756)
1. Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples.
Adams M; Prentice ED; Oki GS
IRB; 1996; 18(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1986; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case for per patient payments.
Lewis JP
IRB; 1988; 10(5):9. PubMed ID: 11650075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
Smith ML
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Why I oppose drug company payment of physician/investigators on a per patient/subject basis.
Roizen R
IRB; 1988; 10(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 11658990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.
Murray TH
IRB; 1986; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology.
Nelkin D; Andrews L
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):30-9. PubMed ID: 11656768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to use of discarded tissues: another impact of AIDS.
Holder AR
IRB; 1987; 9(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11649897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA banking and informed consent -- part 1.
Weir RF; Horton JR
IRB; 1995; 17(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
LoBiondo AR
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
Hardiman R
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
Moline ML; Aisen MW
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The control of living body materials.
Dickens BM
Univ Tor Law J; 1977; 27(2):142-98. PubMed ID: 11660914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict of interest in human research ethics.
Jones DJ
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11654611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters.
Daar JF
Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
