BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654818)

  • 1. Bioethics and public policy: still seeking a forum.
    Hanna KE; Cook-Deegan RM; Nishimi RY
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 11654818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another forum for bioethics in U.S. public policy?
    Mathieu D
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 11654827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward increased public representation on bioethics committees: lessons from judging the Cold War human radiation experiments.
    Szetela C
    Account Res; 1999; 6(3):183-203. PubMed ID: 11658123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do bioethics commissions hijack public debate?
    Moreno JD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):47. PubMed ID: 11644812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles and pragmatism.
    Charo RA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 11653402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An egg takes flight: the once and future life of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
    Capron AM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 11654623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Credibility, persuasiveness, and effectiveness.
    King PA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 11653401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On restoring public bioethics.
    Fletcher JC
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 11654824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinton names 15 to advisory panel on ethics in human experimentation.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1996 Jul; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11648024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A national forum for bioethics: attractive but unworkable or workable but unattractive.
    Blank RH
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 11654821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioethics committees as consensus shapers.
    Rosen E
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Feb; No. 145():13-8. PubMed ID: 11657250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How far should we go?
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1994 Feb; 141(1912):12-3. PubMed ID: 11656309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bioethics panel.
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):583. PubMed ID: 11644821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Will the real bioethics (commission) please stand up?
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8045761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From the Nuremberg Code to bioethics: follow-ups to a founder text.
    Mathieu B
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1998; 49(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 11657544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Bioethics needs better input from public'.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6653):775. PubMed ID: 9349797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of government bioethics.
    Moskowitz EH
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):96-7. PubMed ID: 11654829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioethics and public policy in Australia.
    Gillam L
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 11654825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The blossoming of bioethics at NIH.
    Emanuel EJ
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Dec; 8(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 11657322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Bioethics Advisory Commission proposed charter; request for comments.
    U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
    Fed Regist; 1994 Aug; 59(155):41584-6. PubMed ID: 11656330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.