These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654839)

  • 1. Managed care and patients' trust in medical care: early discharge of newborn infants.
    Lears L
    Health Care Ethics USA; 1997; 5(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State regulation of managed care: fragments of reform.
    Schwartz J
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Dec; 7(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The economics and politics of emergency health care for the poor: the patient dumping dilemma.
    Hylton MO
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1992; 1992(4):971-1033. PubMed ID: 11656274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paying physicians more to do less: financial incentives to limit care.
    Orentlicher D
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):155-97. PubMed ID: 11656852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating the business of medicine: models for integrating ethics and managed care.
    Regan AC
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1997; 30(4):635-84. PubMed ID: 11660772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laws won't let H.M.O.'s tell doctors what to say.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11648039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physician responsibility under managed care: patient advocacy in a changing health care environment. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 170.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics
    ACOG Comm Opin; 1996 Apr; No. 170():5 p. PubMed ID: 11660330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician self-referral and joint venture prohibitions: necessary shield against abusive practices or overregulation?
    Baumgartner MR
    J Corp Law; 1994; 19(2):313-52. PubMed ID: 11652936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law.
    Michna C
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(2):495-528. PubMed ID: 11659864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Position paper on health care and society.
    National Federation of Catholic Physicians' Guilds
    Linacre Q; 1995 Feb; 62(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 11654259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventing patient dumping: sharpening the COBRA's fangs.
    Treiger KI
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1987 Dec; 61(6):1186-223. PubMed ID: 11659026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Containing health care costs: ethical and legal implications of changes in the methods of paying physicians.
    Capron AM; Brock DW; Cassell EJ
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1985-1986; 36(4):708-77. PubMed ID: 11650769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What market values are doing to medicine.
    Relman AS
    Atlantic; 1992 Mar; 269(3):98-102, 105-106. PubMed ID: 11651349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Center stage on the patient protection agenda: grievance and appeal rights.
    Miller TE
    J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 11657354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.