These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654845)

  • 1. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.
    Young ME
    Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
    Mertus J; Heller S
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
    Flannery MT
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
    Ballard T
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control?
    Arthur SL
    UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control?
    Spitz SS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
    Burke M
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant.
    Henley M
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):703-77. PubMed ID: 11659736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whose choice is it, anyway?
    MacKenzie JP
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services.
    Waxman BF
    Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crime, race, and reproduction.
    Roberts DE
    Tulane Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 67(6):1945-77. PubMed ID: 11652259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reservations about women: population policy and reproductive rights.
    Abrams P
    Cornell Int Law J; 1996; 29(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 11660507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Society's response to the new reproductive technologies: the feminist perspectives.
    Wikler NJ
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1043-57. PubMed ID: 11655849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling HIV-positive women's procreative destiny: a critical equal protection analysis.
    Weiss JS
    Const Law J; 1992; 2(2):643-718. PubMed ID: 11651626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The eugenic and racist premise of reproductive rights and population control.
    Akhter F
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's bodies: the site for the ongoing conquest by reproductive technologies.
    Gupta JA
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(2):93-107. PubMed ID: 11651376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
    Persels J
    J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.