200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654878)
1. The Prussian regulation of 1900: early ethical standards for human experimentation in Germany.
Vollmann J; Winau R
IRB; 1996; 18(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 11654878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Standards of accountability for consent in research.
Rubenstein LS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):197-206. PubMed ID: 11654515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The informed-consent policy of the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: knowledge is the best medicine.
Miller MD
Cornell Int Law J; 1997; 30(1):203-44. PubMed ID: 11660583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In response: speaking truth to historiography.
Faden R; Guttman D
Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 11645854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research.
Benson PR; Roth LH
Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Remuneration, freedom of choice, professional guinea pig.
Demarez JP
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 1990; 4(Suppl. 2):189s-96s. PubMed ID: 11651379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The evolution of informed consent in American medicine.
Friedlander WJ
Perspect Biol Med; 1995; 38(3):498-510. PubMed ID: 11644691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unwitting consent: "Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison" tells the story of medical researchers who sacrificed the rights of their subjects for personal profit.
Meyer CR
Minn Med; 1999 Jul; 82(7):53-4. PubMed ID: 11645180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A U.S. experiment on young children ignites painful debate.
Moss M
Wall St J (East Ed); 1996 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11648019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics in mid-century cardiovascular research: apologia.
Burchell HB
Perspect Biol Med; 1996; 39(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 11644787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Revising the history of Cold War research ethics.
Moreno JD; Lederer SE
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 11653394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Tuskegee syphilis experiment: medical ethics, constitutionalism, and property in the body.
Roy B
Harv J Minor Public Health; 1995; 1(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11656513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation experiments on children at the Fernald and Wrentham schools: lessons for protocols in human subject research.
West D
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):103-25. PubMed ID: 11660586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
