167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654885)
1. Deniers of the truth.
Dixon B
Sciences (New York); 1984; 24(1):23-24, 26. PubMed ID: 11654885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
Wilmshurst P
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breaking faith.
Root-Bernstein RS
Sciences (New York); 1989; 29(6):8-11. PubMed ID: 11650301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences.
Davis RD
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is science really a pack of lies?
Nature; 1983 Jun; 303(5916):361-2. PubMed ID: 11653465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.
Chubin DE
Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical truth and progress in science.
Evans C
New Sci; 1984 Jan; 101(1394):43-5. PubMed ID: 11655576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science, lies and the ultimate truth.
Ehrenreich B
Time; 1991 May; 137(20):66. PubMed ID: 11651105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research.
Garte SJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11657881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How far do you trust your colleagues?
Neufeld A
New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud will out--or will it?
Tangney JP
New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What science can learn from science fraud.
Wade N
New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1368):273-5. PubMed ID: 11655555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
