These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654984)
1. Women's Health Law Symposium, Rutgers School of Law-Newark, April 6, 1994. Keville T; Johnson TL; Epstein SS; Podhorin R; Swanston SF Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 16(1):17-41. PubMed ID: 11654984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research. Keville TD Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender matters: implications for clinical research and women's health care. Rothenberg KH Houst Law Rev; 1996 Symposium; 32(5):1201-72. PubMed ID: 11660524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials. Charo RA St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. There is no women's health crisis. Satel SL Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender equity in research. Taylor C J Womens Health; 1994 Jun; 3(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 11659807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The sex-bias myth in medicine. Kadar AG Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Institute of Medicine's report on women and health research: implications for IRBs and the research community. Rothenberg KH IRB; 1996; 18(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's health research: policy and practice. Ickovics JR; Epel ES IRB; 1993; 15(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HIV, women, and access to clinical trials: tort liability and lessons from DES. Mastroianni AC Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):167-91. PubMed ID: 11979601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective. Bagley G Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity. Levine C IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Women in clinical trials: an introduction. Merkatz RB Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11653138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking beyond judicial deference to agency discretion: a fundamental right of access to RU 486? Silverberg EA Brooklyn Law Rev; 1994; 59(4):1551-615. PubMed ID: 11656497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs; notice. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Fed Regist; 1993 Jul; 58(139):39406-16. PubMed ID: 11645233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects. Fletcher JC Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health unit is urged to improve management of its AIDS research. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]