These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The right over one's own body: its scope and limits in comparative law. Meulders-Klein MT Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(1):29-79. PubMed ID: 11655891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Life and death decisions: who makes them and by what standards? Pollock SG Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):505-40. PubMed ID: 11649262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die. Sunstein CR Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethics and the family: the cautionary view from family law. Schneider CE Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):819-47. PubMed ID: 11656533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The assault on privacy in healthcare decisionmaking. Rich BA Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 11651237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach. Beschle DL Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does pro-choice mean pro-Kevorkian? An essay on Roe, Casey, and the right to die. Kreimer SF Am Univ Law Rev; 1995 Feb; 44(3):803-54. PubMed ID: 11660036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11644636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical law and ethics in the post-autonomy age. Dworkin RB Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(3):727-42. PubMed ID: 11652810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination. DiCamillo JA Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]