255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654998)
1. Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the Nuremberg doctors' trials.
Diamond EF
Linacre Q; 1997 May; 64(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 11654998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On human experimentation.
DeMarco D
Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):48-60. PubMed ID: 11655592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accountability in research using persons with mental illness.
Shamoo AE; Irving DN
Account Res; 1993; 3(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Eugenics, euthanasia and genocide.
Garver KL; Garver B
Linacre Q; 1992 Aug; 59(3):24-51. PubMed ID: 11651447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Nazi doctors trial and the international prohibition on medical involvement in torture.
Lippman M
Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1993 Feb; 15(2):395-441. PubMed ID: 11652301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.
Baker R
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):233-73. PubMed ID: 11656933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.
Baker R
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):201-31. PubMed ID: 11656932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research.
Benson PR; Roth LH
Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justice in fetal experimentation.
Abrams N
J Value Inq; 1979; 13(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 11665154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal tissue transplantation policy in the United States.
Vawter DE
Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 11656401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning.
Markey K
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical aerobics: ACHRE's flight from responsibility.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Stubbs C; Mora-Corrasco F
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):15-61. PubMed ID: 11660589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
Horan DJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Nuremberg Code and medical research.
Grodin MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):4. PubMed ID: 11650360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
Meechan CM
Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nuremberg revisited.
Voelker R
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1631. PubMed ID: 11644852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
