196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655042)
1. Ethics and relationships in laboratories and research communities.
Weil V; Arzbaecher R
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):83-125. PubMed ID: 11655042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting and reporting research.
Bird SJ; Housman DE
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):127-54. PubMed ID: 11655035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment.
Werhane P; Doering J
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):47-81. PubMed ID: 11655040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research.
Garte SJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11657881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Case studies for teaching research ethics.
Elliott D
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):179-98. PubMed ID: 11655038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Social epistemology and the ethics of research.
Resnik D
Stud Hist Philos Sci; 1996 Dec; 27(4):565-86. PubMed ID: 11645816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
Pellegrino ED
Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers.
Heitman E
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The institutional context for research.
Berger EM; Gert B
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Honest research.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11657880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An introduction to research ethics.
Friedman PJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):443-56. PubMed ID: 11657731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
Luft P; Sprague RL
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why be my colleague's keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.
Cain J
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Oct; 5(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 11658232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioetiquette.
Martin J; Stent GS
Perspect Biol Med; 1998; 41(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11645029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud and the norms of science.
Schmaus W
Sci Technol Human Values; 1983; 8(4):12-22. PubMed ID: 11651715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parafraud in biology.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 11657883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Promoting responsible conduct: striving for change rather than consensus. Commentary on "Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research" (F. Grinnell).
Zigmond MJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 11657860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
