191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655182)
1. From coitus to commerce: legal and social consequences of noncoital reproduction.
Hollinger JH
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):865-932. PubMed ID: 11655182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel.
Shapira A
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
Brandel A
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering.
Rozovsky LE
Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion.
Townsend MD
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization.
Andrews LB
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws.
Appleton SF
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health panel seeks sweeping changes in fertility therapy.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Apr; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11648069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose baby is it anyway?
Vines G
New Sci; 1986 Jul; 111(1515):26-7. PubMed ID: 11658781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Norwegian law on assisted reproduction and genetics: the act relating to the application of biotechnology in medicine.
Norway
Bull Med Ethics; 1994; No. 99():8-11. PubMed ID: 11659892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood.
Little MO
Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals.
Wadlington WJ
Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
