These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655233)
41. Embryos and Europe: what prospects for harmonisation? Hornett S New Law J; 1991 May; 141(6505):713-714, 721. PubMed ID: 11659399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Cloning for research 'should be allowed'. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6637):6. PubMed ID: 9214486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Possible protection for researchers who maintain genetic data records. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Apr; 11(4):6. PubMed ID: 11660233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Unauthorized embryo transfer at the University of California, Irvine Center for Reproductive Health. Kakkar S Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):1015-33. PubMed ID: 11657284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation. Lorio KV Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Sixty-third conference of the International Law Association (Warsaw, 21-27 Aug 1988) adopts resolution on reproductive technologies. International Law Association Int Dig Health Legis; 1990; 41(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 11651054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Archive available for genetic studies. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5342):1389. PubMed ID: 11644980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Preliminary draft of a Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights. Unesco. International Bioethics Committee Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 11654812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Artificial insemination and the law. Jensen BJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Is knowledge always good? King D Genethics News; 1996; No. 12():6-7. PubMed ID: 11655116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The legal status of the embryo. Andrews LB Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. UNESCO drafts bioethics declaration. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Oct; 278(5335):23. PubMed ID: 11644999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Cloning in America: constitutional rights and limits. Erwin C J Biolaw Bus; 2000; 3(4):21-33. PubMed ID: 14627028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Gene treaty promises rewards for unique peoples. Coghlan A New Sci; 1996 Nov; 152(2054):8. PubMed ID: 11656591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Cloning consensus: creating a convention to ban human reproductive cloning. Riordan PJ Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 2003; 26(2):411-44. PubMed ID: 15744900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Prospecting for genetic gold: compensating genetic research donors. Triber GA J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 2(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 11657635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Preventing a brave new world: why we should ban human cloning now. Kass LR New Repub; 2001 May; 224(21):30-9. PubMed ID: 11794303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]