396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655269)
1. Refusal of treatment: competent child and parents -- Houston, Applicant.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 11655269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors.
Costello JC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
Edwards L
Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Feeding the hunger artists: legal issues in treating anorexia nervosa.
Dresser R
Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):297-374. PubMed ID: 11653754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment.
Schmidt K
Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The never-never land of mental health law: a review of the legal rights of youth committed by their parents to psychiatric facilities in California.
Hollar SS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1989-1990; 4(2):300-15. PubMed ID: 11659276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law of 2 July 1992 of the Russian Federation on psychiatric care and the safeguarding of citizens' rights in the dispensing of such care.
Russian Federation
Int Dig Health Legis; 1993; 44(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11655198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Keyholders and flak jackets: consent to medical treatment for children.
Nicholls M
Family Law; 1994 Feb; 24():81-5. PubMed ID: 11660606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wardship court enforces treatment.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6798):332. PubMed ID: 11642904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who decides for the child?
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Jul; No. 149():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
Austin G
Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
Redding RE
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Limiting Gillick.
Douglas G
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment).
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of children in making health care decisions: a comparative approach.
Broyde CS
Natl Jew Law Rev; 1987; 2():123-35. PubMed ID: 11658826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines for the psychiatric hospitalization of minors.
American Psychiatric Association
Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 139(7):971-4. PubMed ID: 11643760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Four alternatives to the guidelines for the psychiatric hospitalization of minors: clinical and legal considerations.
Stone AA; Bonnie R;
Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 139(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 11643761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
