136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655270)
1. Incompetent patient (PVS): decision-making, courts and the family -- In re Tavel.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 11655270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Tavel.
Delaware. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1995 Aug; 661():1061-72. PubMed ID: 11648308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Bayer.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetent patient (PVS): withdrawal of feeding (Scotland) -- Law Hospital N.H.S. Trust v. The Lord Advocate.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 11657153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Severns v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.
Delaware. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1980 Sep; 421():1334-50. PubMed ID: 11648457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Drabick.
California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the ultimate decision.
Stone J
New Law J; 1994 Feb; 144(6635):205-6. PubMed ID: 11652805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Delaware Supreme Court upholds right of incompetent person to die.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1981; 5(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 11663212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Gordy.
Delaware. Court of Chancery, New Castle County
Atl Report; 1994 Dec; 658():613-9. PubMed ID: 11648291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Edna M.F.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1997 Jun; 563():485-501. PubMed ID: 12041175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Doctors as gods.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Jul; 319(7201):64. PubMed ID: 10390489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
