These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655362)
21. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rasmussen v. Fleming. Pollard CT Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Constitutionalizing the "right to die". Mayo TW MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Another ethics consultant looks at Mr. B's case: commentary on "An ethical dilemma. Perkins HS J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 11642827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late? Chapman MA Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In re Strauss. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):405-6. PubMed ID: 11644340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Feenan D J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The ethics of surrogate decision making. Moros DA; Rhodes R Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 11642937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The doctor-proxy relationship: perception and communication. Zelenik J; Post LF; Mulvihill M; Jacobs LG; Burton WB; Dubler NN J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11657138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Case presentation 1 (1991): A question of moral authority: a nurse's predicament -- response by the Mt. Sinai Hospital's (Hartford, CT) HEC. HEC Forum; 1991; 3(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 11645695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. African American caregivers' preferences for life-sustaining treatment. Bonner G; Gorelick PB; Prohaska T; Freels S; Theis S; Davis L J Ethics Law Aging; 1999; 5(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 11657822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Supporting life through tube feeding: factors influencing surrogate decision-making. Wilson D Can J Aging; 1993; 12(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 11660005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? Seckler AB; Meier DE; Mulvihill M; Paris BE Ann Intern Med; 1991 Jul; 115(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 2058868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Families are warned they can't decide treatment for incapacitated relatives. Dyer C BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7436. PubMed ID: 24335719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]