These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655391)

  • 1. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
    Cane MB
    Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability.
    Blank RH
    West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus.
    Wood MA; Hawkins LB
    Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
    Rubin ER
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H
    Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D; Nasser WP
    Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes.
    Bartleman A
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion: 'settling' the issue.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11649082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. planned Parenthood v. Danforth: resolving the antinomy.
    Straus TR
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1977; 4(2):425-40. PubMed ID: 11664851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court on abortion--a dissenting opinion.
    Onley PT; McKenna RJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11663413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.