These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the law in 1980. Paul EW; Schaap P NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Amendment to DHEW Appropriation Act, 1977, concerning the use of federal funds for abortion. Packwood RW Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Jun; 122(102):S10793-807. PubMed ID: 11663738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Paying for abortion: is the Court wrong? Shinn Re Christ Crisis; 1977 Sep; 37(14):202-7. PubMed ID: 11663787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking Roe v. Wade. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Carter traps self on abortion issue. Hum Events; 1977 Jul; 37(27):500-1. PubMed ID: 11663812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The abortion decision: two years later. More Christian than its critics. Decker RG Commonweal; 1975 Feb; 101(14):384-388+. PubMed ID: 11663610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A half-step forward: the justices retreat on abortion. Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(4):11-8. PubMed ID: 11663789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The politics of abortion. Gearty C J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment. Byrn RM America (NY); 1976 Jun; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American population policy abroad: the Mexico City abortion funding restrictions. Fox GH N Y Univ J Int Law Polit; 1986; 18(2):609-62. PubMed ID: 11655815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]