174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655551)
1. Fraud and secrecy: the twin perils of science.
New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1361):712-3. PubMed ID: 11655551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The scientific community perspective on research integrity.
Teich AH
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud will out--or will it?
Tangney JP
New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5052):1636. PubMed ID: 11642983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientists retract embryo study, saying research was fraudulent.
Angier N
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11646943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
Lock S
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What science can learn from science fraud.
Wade N
New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1368):273-5. PubMed ID: 11655555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fraud in science.
S Afr Med J; 1983 Aug; 64(6):190-1. PubMed ID: 11644034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Breaking faith.
Root-Bernstein RS
Sciences (New York); 1989; 29(6):8-11. PubMed ID: 11650301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data.
Greenberg M; Goldberg L
Sci Technol Human Values; 1994; 19(2):223-41. PubMed ID: 11652278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
Annau Z
Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
