177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655561)
1. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated.
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins?
Steinbock B
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
Portela C
Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
Otten M
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On letting some babies die.
Smith DH
Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
Conley JJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tragedies and medical choices.
Lammers SE
Christ Century; 1993 Sep 8-15; 110(25):845-6. PubMed ID: 11660055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Joining in life and death: on separating the Lakeberg twins.
Dougherty CJ
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11653280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alleged neglect of Siamese twins raises ethical issues.
Vogel D; Wood AP
Ob Gyn News; 1981 Sep; 16(18):18. PubMed ID: 11651673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: the right to choose.
Smith S
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11657338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
McFadden JP; Hentoff N
Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The case of the Bloomington baby.
Bannon A
Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(4):63-8. PubMed ID: 11651707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Little murders.
Patrick JG
New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma.
Brant J; McNulty A
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The death of Infant Doe.
Verhey A
Reform J; 1982 Jun; 32(6):10-5. PubMed ID: 11651829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
