These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655573)
1. Oncogene researchers may run cancer risk. Yanchinski S New Sci; 1983 Aug; 99(1372):530. PubMed ID: 11655573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. GMAG and the teenage jackass. Denselow J New Sci; 1982 Aug; 95(1320):558-61. PubMed ID: 11655478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The great 'recombinant DNA' controversy and the need for public debate. Pearson M Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):3-4+. PubMed ID: 11650574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinant DNA pioneers lower the alarm. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1977 Jul; 7(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The DNA debate. Armentrout RW; Randal J Med Dimens; 1978; 7(6):14+. PubMed ID: 11663291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tinkering with life. Time; 1977 Apr; 109(16):32-34+. PubMed ID: 11661472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recombinant DNA guidelines wear thin: NIH moves to voluntary regulation. Dickson D Nature; 1981 May; 29(5810):3. PubMed ID: 11661933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombinant DNA Act--S. 1217. Nelson G Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Aug; 123(132):S13312-9. PubMed ID: 11661670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New strains of life--or death. Cavalieri LF N Y Times Mag; 1976 p 8-9+; 22 Aug 1976():. PubMed ID: 11661338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientists ask Congress to control DNA research. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 Feb; 27(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 11661597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fruits of gene-juggling: blessing or curse? Med World News; 1976 Oct; 17(21):45+. PubMed ID: 11661341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hazardous biological activities in outer space. McGarrigle P Akron Law Rev; 1984; 18(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 11658579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reasonableness versus rationality in the construction and justification of science policy decisions: the case of the Cambridge Experimentation Review Board. Waddell C Sci Technol Human Values; 1989; 14(1):7-25. PubMed ID: 11650830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubts over genetic engineering controls. Wright S New Sci; 1976 Dec; 72(1029):520-1. PubMed ID: 11663697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA and the congressional prerogatives: proposals for a deliberate legislative approach to genetic research. English TL Indiana Law J; 1978; 53(3):571-84. PubMed ID: 11661591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recombinant DNA: issues on the regulation of basic scientific research. Bereano PL IDEA J Law Technol; 1979 Dec; 20(4):315-34. PubMed ID: 11662787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. You shall be as gods. Powledge TM Worldview; 1977 Sep; 20(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 11661489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. US genetic engineers cut through red tape. New Sci; 1981 Jan; 89(1237):198. PubMed ID: 11664091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]