These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655593)

  • 1. Toward the new future.
    McFadden JP
    Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):5-20. PubMed ID: 11655593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
    Wakefield-Fisher M
    Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Baby Doe and local option.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics committee guidelines issued.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(18):1, 34. PubMed ID: 11646386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby Doe was not just the New Right's baby.
    Diamond EF
    Med World News; 1984 Jan; 25(2):122. PubMed ID: 11645504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortions and infanticide: America's movement away from human rights.
    Andrusko D
    Lincoln Rev; 1985; 5(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 11655734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel specifies who should decide to 'pull the plug.
    Med World News; 1982 Nov; 23(24):6-9. PubMed ID: 11645475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who should make medical decisions?
    Genel M
    Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lawsuit challenges 'Baby Doe' regulation.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twenty questions about ethics committees.
    Capron AM
    Ethics Comm Newsl; 1984 Jun; 1(4):2-10. PubMed ID: 11651761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.