These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655596)

  • 1. Harvard wins key biotech patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Dec; 100(1387):741. PubMed ID: 11655596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harvard keeps its hands clean.
    New Sci; 1980 Nov; 88(1228):497. PubMed ID: 11664112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loopholes appear in genetic engineering patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1981 Sep; 91(1270):642. PubMed ID: 11664153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Universities plan to speed sale of biotechnology.
    New Sci; 1983 Mar; 97(1349):704. PubMed ID: 11655523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic engineering deflowered.
    New Sci; 1982 Jan; 93(1289):163. PubMed ID: 11655395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology transfer at Harvard University.
    Steiner D
    Bioethics Q; 1980; 2(4):203-11. PubMed ID: 11645452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetics and the profit motive.
    America (NY); 1980 Nov; 143(15):301. PubMed ID: 11665161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stanford battles for cash from DNA patent.
    Dwyer P
    New Sci; 1982 Nov; 96(1330):277. PubMed ID: 11655465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A footnote to the Cohen-Boyer patent and other musings.
    Goldstein JA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1982 Dec; 5(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 6962469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A matter of life and patents.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1991 Jan; 129(1751):56-61. PubMed ID: 11659287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing innovation: university-industry partnerships and the licensing of the Harvard mouse.
    Blaug S; Chien C; Shuster MJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):761-4. PubMed ID: 15175696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Report urges freedom for genetic engineers.
    New Sci; 1981 Apr; 90(1247):8. PubMed ID: 11664138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patenting nanotechnology.
    Lemley MA
    Stanford Law Rev; 2005 Nov; 58(2):601-30. PubMed ID: 16395838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stanford's patent prize.
    Nature; 1981 Aug; 292(5824):571-2. PubMed ID: 11643655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New life forms: a clear road ahead?
    US News World Rep; 1980 Jun; 88(25):34-5. PubMed ID: 11661843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Why patent now?].
    Ishino M
    Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2004 Jan; 49(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 14748142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harvard drops plans to join genetic firm.
    Am Med News; 1980 Nov; 23(46):6. PubMed ID: 11645439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotech patents-business as usual?
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
    Coombs A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overcoming the challenges in the pharma/biotech industry.
    Graul AI; Prous JR
    Drug News Perspect; 2007; 20(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 17332900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.