These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. New life in US patents: the Chakrabarty case. Daus DG Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1981 Jul; 3(7):194-200. PubMed ID: 11650711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biotechnology patent law developments in Great Britain and the United States: analysis of a hypothetical patent claim for a synthesized virus. Auerbach BC Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):563-90. PubMed ID: 11649615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Philosopher's paradise: should a microorganism the product of a microbiologist be patentable? Clark S Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1981 Jul; 4(2):129-50. PubMed ID: 11650563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Microorganism patents. Behringer JW J Pat Off Soc; 1981 Mar; 63(3):128-37. PubMed ID: 11650632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patenting transgenic human embryos: a nonuse cost perspective. Burk DL Houst Law Rev; 1993; 30(4):1597-669. PubMed ID: 11659869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The spiral of patents pending. Will GF Washington Post; 1980 Jun; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11646211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patenting life is no guarantee of success. Yanchinski S New Sci; 1980 Jun; 86(1207):373. PubMed ID: 11664063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of biotechnology on patent law. Plant DW Technol Soc; 1983; 5(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 11650688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene engineering: patent for products. Miller JA Sci News; 1984 Sep; 126(10):150. PubMed ID: 11653590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Vital essences and human wholeness: the social readings of biological information. Kevles DJ South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):255-78. PubMed ID: 11645834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical research enters the marketplace. Culliton BJ N Engl J Med; 1981 May; 304(20):1195-201. PubMed ID: 6938776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patenting life. Washington Post; 1980 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biotechnology and the law: social responsibility or freedom of scientific inquiry? Smith GP Mercer Law Rev; 1988; 39(2):437-60. PubMed ID: 11650141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposals on genetic technology: U.S. panel urges easing of regulation. Andrews EL N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():D1, D7. PubMed ID: 11646818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Of mice and machine: a paradigmatic challenge to interpretation of the patent statute. Chiapetta JR William Mitchell Law Rev; 1994; 20(1):155-90. PubMed ID: 11652852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]