These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655603)

  • 21. Loopholes appear in genetic engineering patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1981 Sep; 91(1270):642. PubMed ID: 11664153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patentability of genetic inventions in animals.
    Moufang R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1989; 20(6):823-46. PubMed ID: 11650905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Building a better bacterium: genetic engineering and the patent law after Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
    Krueger KG
    Columbia Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 81(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11650475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patenting of life forms.
    Pautler G
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):47-50, 76. PubMed ID: 11649513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decision due in billion-dollar patent row.
    Fox B
    New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1364):923. PubMed ID: 11655534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Copyright in living genetically engineered works.
    Kayton I
    George Washington Law Rev; 1982 Jan; 50(2):191-218. PubMed ID: 11650705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patent protection for biological inventions--review of recent case law in EEC countries.
    Vossius V
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1979 Oct; 1():278-82. PubMed ID: 11662912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Science debates using tools to redesign life.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1,A17. PubMed ID: 11646571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical and legal issues in patenting new animal life.
    Dresser R
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 28(4):399-435. PubMed ID: 11652544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Animals as inventions: biotechnology and intellectual property rights.
    Sagoff M
    Rep Inst Philos Public Policy; 1996; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11654360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microbiological inventions and the Patent Law--the international dimension.
    Crespi RS
    Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 1985; 3():1-37. PubMed ID: 3911974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patentability of micro-organisms: Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
    Burns K
    Ark Law Rev; 1982; 35(2):313-27. PubMed ID: 11650697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patentability in the United States of microorganisms, processes utilizing microorganisms, products produced by microorganisms and microorganism mutational and genetic modification techniques.
    Biggart WA
    IDEA J Law Technol; 1981; 22(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 11652409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
    Howard JJ
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An international comparative analysis of the patentability of recombinant DNA-derived organisms.
    Sparrow CN
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):945-57. PubMed ID: 11649594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patent decision fuels genetic research debate.
    Podgers J
    Am Bar Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 66():943-4. PubMed ID: 11662811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patent sought on making of part-human creatures: scientist seeks to touch off ethics debate.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1998 Apr; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gene patent granted: now the real fight begins.
    Anderson I
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1420):7. PubMed ID: 11655626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Innocuous inoculum or perilous parasite? Encouraging genetic research through patent grants: a call for regulation and debate.
    Brashear JF
    San Diego Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 18(2):263-99. PubMed ID: 11650644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the illogical climax to the animal patenting debate.
    Bateman R
    J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11652309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.