148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655607)
1. Court blocks field trial of spliced genes.
Joyce C
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1411):7. PubMed ID: 11655607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court rules against gene-splice field test.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 May; 125(21):325. PubMed ID: 11653546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. judge halts experiment in gene altering.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 May; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11646387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed decision in gene-splice trial.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1985 Mar; 127(10):148-9. PubMed ID: 11653605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frost-free bacteria lawsuit.
Sci News; 1985 Mar; 127(9):135. PubMed ID: 11653601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The appeal of gene-splice field tests.
Sci News; 1984 Dec 22-29; 126(25-26):397. PubMed ID: 11653596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene-spliced corn field test postponed.
Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):61. PubMed ID: 11653589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Agricultural genetics goes to court.
Fox JL; Norman C
Science; 1983 Sep; 221(4618):1355. PubMed ID: 11644043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further attack on gene-splice tests.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):55. PubMed ID: 11653588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Industry gene-splice field tests approved.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 Jun; 125(23):356. PubMed ID: 11653555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. agrigenetics: suit filed against NIH.
David P
Nature; 1983 Sep; 305(5932):262. PubMed ID: 11653490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recombinant DNA research; availability of environmental assessment for public comment; request for comments on need for a programmatic environmental impact statement; notice.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(72):14794-6. PubMed ID: 11645548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. California field test goes forward.
Crawford M
Science; 1987 May; 236(4801):511. PubMed ID: 11643987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Feb; 756():143-61. PubMed ID: 11648295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal threat, cold delay UC experiment.
Norman C
Science; 1983 Oct; 222(4621):309. PubMed ID: 11644056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after.
Barkstrom JE
Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests.
Joyce C
New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
Pendorf S
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
