128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655611)
1. Abortion and the indigent.
Altman A
J Soc Philos; 1980 Jan; 11(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
Brock VM
Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
Lalli MA
Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Erca A
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beal, Maher and Poelker: the end of an era?
Gall-Clayton N
J Fam Law; 1978; 17(1):49-92. PubMed ID: 11655402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Doe v. Maher.
Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Libby FA
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Indigent women--what right to abortion?
Friedman BW
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Denial of public funds for nontherapeutic abortions.
Stingle KD
Conn Law Rev; 1978; 10(2):487-510. PubMed ID: 11663904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Doe v. Percy.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1979 Sep; 476():324-34. PubMed ID: 11648353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe.
Ryan JS
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1978; 7(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 11663178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
Copelon R
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state?
Devlin J
LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
Baron DR
Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
Vuernick R
J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
