152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655656)
1. Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
Harris DJ
J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.
Sherman CW
Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 70(4):978-1013. PubMed ID: 11655731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Erca A
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The denial of Medi-Cal funds for abortion: an establishment of religion.
Symonds E
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):421-49. PubMed ID: 11664071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doe v. Percy.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1979 Sep; 476():324-34. PubMed ID: 11648353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 482():1137-48. PubMed ID: 11648338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Dec; 542():17-42. PubMed ID: 12041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers.
California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3
Wests Calif Report; 1979 May; 156():73-91. PubMed ID: 11648454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Doe v. Department of Social Services.
Michigan. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():166-94. PubMed ID: 12041154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
