These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655722)
21. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The conscious law. Goolsby AC State Health Legis Rep; 1983 Feb; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11658379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia. Manderson D Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure. Hertz J Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence. Knapp TA; Huff RL J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Jan; 3(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11643353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals? Callan DE Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The minor's right to consent to medical treatment: a corollary of the constitutional right of privacy. Raitt GE South Calif Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 48(6):1417-56. PubMed ID: 11664463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal. Morton JE Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Amniocentesis in medicine and law: practice standards and legal ramifications. Fineberg KS; Peters JD Trial; 1984 Feb; 20(2):54-56, 58-59. PubMed ID: 11658749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California. Churchward AB Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]