These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655744)

  • 21. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations.
    Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The establishment clause argument for choice.
    Dow DR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):479-500. PubMed ID: 11656140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The quality of life: from Roe to Quinlan and beyond.
    Cincotta J
    Cathol Lawyer; 1979; 25(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 11664101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
    Cane MB
    Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA; Nowak JE
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes.
    Bartleman A
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
    Clark AE
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Choice rights and abortion: the begetting choice right and state obstacles to choice in light of artificial womb technology.
    Goldstein MA
    South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 51(5):877-921. PubMed ID: 11663901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H
    Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
    Prygoski PJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
    Lewis JL
    Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Granfield D
    Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
    Dougherty CJ
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.