These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655745)
1. The fetus under Section 1983: still struggling for recognition. Czepiga PT Syracuse Law Rev; 1983; 34(4):1029-65. PubMed ID: 11655745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception. Rubenfeld J Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Congress create people? Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law. Martyn K UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note. Glenn HP McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade. Rice CF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise. Carter SL Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]