200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655769)
1. The use of in vitro fertilization: is there a right to bear or beget a child by any available medical means?
Eccles MR
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):1033-57. PubMed ID: 11655769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization.
Flannery DM
Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried.
Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
Baylson MM
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can surrogate parenting be stopped? An inspection of the constitutional and pragmatic aspects of outlawing surrogate mother arrangements.
Krimmel HT
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1992; 27(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11652236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
Annas GJ
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy.
Bradley TS
John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
Taylor S
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
Hemphill L
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say?
Diggins M
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial human reproduction: legal problems presented by the test tube baby.
Steeves SM
Emory Law J; 1979; 28(4):1045-79. PubMed ID: 11665235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
Smith GP; Iraola R
Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
