These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655781)
1. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice. Mathieu D Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy. Steinbock B Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women. Annas GJ Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of consent although informed: fetal neglect. Reece SA; Reece EA Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 11649199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict? Rogers S Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care? Phelan JP South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Restricting donative choice: fetal tissue transplantation and respect for human life. Kinney JH J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(2):259-85. PubMed ID: 11657412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mama vs. fetus. Hornick HL Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime? Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy. Mayo TW Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict. Hornstra D Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 11656772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prematernal duty and the resolution of conflict. Yeast JD Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11653277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]