These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655796)

  • 21. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High court's ruling enshrines abortion as fundamental right.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
    Picher PC
    Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
    Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The battle over abortion.
    Salholz E
    Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. States may require girl to notify parents before having abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
    Lalli MA
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The center holds!
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation.
    Erato LD
    Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The abortion cases: a return to Lochner, or a new substantive due process?
    Albany Law Rev; 1973; 37(4):776-97. PubMed ID: 11663363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simopoulos v. Virginia.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():506-22. PubMed ID: 12041277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.