These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655796)

  • 41. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. "But whoever treasures freedom...": the right to travel and extraterritorial abortions.
    Kreimer SF
    Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 91(5):907-38. PubMed ID: 11656299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Webster and the future of substantive due process.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1990; 28(2):271-94. PubMed ID: 11656037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Constitutional law: state abortion regulations held constitutional.
    Ritchie JA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978 R I. Survey; 12(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 11663902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Abortion: the Court's intellectual scandal.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():B7. PubMed ID: 11647350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
    Olmstead FH
    Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence.
    Metzger GE
    Columbia Law Rev; 1994; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
    Clark AE
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1988 Jul; 851():1071-85. PubMed ID: 11648383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause.
    Barber CK
    Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
    Jipping TL
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The road not taken: state constitutions as an alternative source of protection for reproductive rights.
    O'Neill KF
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1993; 11(Part 1):1-77. PubMed ID: 11656430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.