These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655805)
1. Abortion--provisions of the Michigan Public Health Code which require facilities performing first trimester abortions to provide abortion counseling... Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen, 743 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1984). Neagli DB J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(4):619-25. PubMed ID: 11655805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 743():352-69. PubMed ID: 11648349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ragsdale v. Turnock. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Apr; 841():1358-408. PubMed ID: 11648382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts. U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island Fed Suppl; 1981 Apr; 512():316-25. PubMed ID: 11648519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. Curry RE J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--abortion--a requirement that "all" second trimester abortions shall be performed in a hospital is unconstitutional--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 51 U.S.L.W. 4767 (June 15, 1983). Colbert J Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1983 Fall-1984 Spring; 9(1-2):144-65. PubMed ID: 11655796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The viability of the trimester approach. Calder KA Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts. U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island Fed Suppl; 1982 Jan; 530():1136-54. PubMed ID: 11648520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right of privacy--mandatory hospitalization for all second trimester abortions invalidated as not being reasonably related to maternal health--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 103 S.Ct. 2481 (1983). Lim DG Santa Clara Law Rev; 1984; 24(3):789-801. PubMed ID: 11655804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Florida Women's Medical Clinic v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida, N.D Fed Suppl; 1982 Mar; 536():1048-65. PubMed ID: 11648334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last? Casurella JG; Schrock CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Official tells of U.S. plan to discourage abortions. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ragsdale v. Turnock. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1985 Nov; 625():1212-31. PubMed ID: 11648365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]